Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide1,2. Stroke disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, where it occurs, on average, 15 years earlier than in high-income countries1. The two main types are ischemic stroke (85%) and intracerebral hemorrhage (15%)3. Ischemic stroke, accounting for the vast majority of strokes, results from cerebral blood-flow blockage, leading to cell death and brain infarction4. The ischemic cascade involves multiple biochemical events, including significant pro-oxidative processes5,6.
Despite extensive pre-clinical and clinical efforts, only a handful of therapies—most notably intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombectomy—have proven efficacious, and these treatments are limited by narrow therapeutic windows and strict patient-selection criteria. Consequently, there is an urgent need to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying ischemic injury, neurovascular repair, and post-stroke recovery. A reproducible, clinically relevant animal model is indispensable for achieving this goal.
The middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model is broadly used to explore ischemic stroke in rodents7,8. The intraluminal filament occlusion method is one of the most classic and widely used MCAO techniques9. This technique can model both permanent and transient occlusions without requiring craniectomy. A newer transfemoral technique using endovascular wires has shown promise for inducing transient MCAO in rats, offering more consistent outcomes10. This model involves occluding the middle cerebral artery, typically using an intraluminal filament technique11. MCAO causes focal cerebral hypoperfusion, leading to ischemia and reperfusion injury12.
While MCAO is valuable for investigating stroke pathophysiology and potential treatments, it can produce variable lesion volumes7. Therefore, improvements to the MCAO model—such as refining reperfusion techniques, establishing standardized operating protocols, and developing unified evaluation criteria—can reduce variability in infarct location and volume, thereby enhancing its utility in ischemic stroke research.
This protocol requires a learning curve of approximately 10–15 surgeries to achieve consistent results13. Success rates may vary based on operator experience and rat strain14. The model is suitable for studying acute ischemic stroke but may not fully replicate human comorbidities such as hypertension or diabetes15. Accordingly, we sought to devise and rigorously validate an optimized MCAO protocol that aims to reduce experimental variability through standardized procedures and rigorous quality control measures. Four complementary innovations were integrated to achieve dual gains in standardization and data reliability: (1) Dual-time-point longitudinal assessment—neurological scores from the Zea-Longa, Bederson and Modified Garcia scales were obtained in parallel with 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)-derived infarct volumes at 24 h and 72 h post-reperfusion, delineating the temporal relationship between edema resolution and functional recovery; (2) Triple-scale cross-validation—blinded, dual-investigator scoring with integrated tri-scale calibration significantly increased the sensitivity and precision of behavioral evaluation; (3) Whole-course hypothermic rapid-sectioning—a standard operating procedure (SOP) of "90 s ice bath extraction followed by single-step 2-mm coronal slicing in pre-chilled molds" was established to minimize autolysis and human error, ensuring high-fidelity volumetric measurements; (4) Integrated quality-control framework—a comprehensive SOP spanning preoperative fasting, anesthesia depth control, preoperative thermoregulation, and cross-contamination prevention was constructed to deliver a reproducible and readily transferable MCAO standard operating procedure, laying a solid foundation for inter-laboratory consistency and cross-study comparability.